Saturday, June 2, 2007

A1: "Wal-Mart foes face campaign violation charges"

You probably saw this coming. Not content to bury the opposition at the polls, the well financed Wal-Mart shills have marshaled their lawyers to escalate the pissing contest. Perhaps the court will see it for what it is.

I think the editors could have hit this copy a little harder, though. As with previous stories on this legal battle, it's messy and confusing.

1 comment:

leftturnclyde said...

"Kooiman, a real estate broker who indicated that she sought to run a "positive campaign" on behalf of Proposition 400, said Thursday morning that she was too busy to respond to questions from a reporter from The Daily Courier. She did not return a follow-up phone call."
this paragraph sez it all dont it?