Muggs archive

Thursday, August 9, 2007

A1: "Law enforcement issues arise at candidate forum"

In her second graph Cindy Barks mentions that water and growth dominated "much of the discussion," but coverage of these more important issues didn't make it into her story. Instead we get the non-issue of illegal immigration and the sexy-but-stupid idea of red-light cameras. Whether Cindy did this on purpose or not, or perhaps got a memo about it from the editor, it shows how editorial choices can insidiously influence the public discussion through omission and refocusing.

4 comments:

  1. If you're still alive, try to update more often, Steve.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for checking in. I've been going through some personal stuff, I'll be back.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sorry, Steve. Best of luck with that. We miss you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Steve, were you as appalled and embarrassed as I was for the Courier when the "Mmmm...Eye Candy" hit the newsstands? I mean that's a headline I'd expect to see in a bad porn mag, not a newspaper, let alone a community newspaper. Wow, how embarrassing. jared

    ReplyDelete

I encourage you to share your own views and experience with me and other readers. How you do that matters, and I'm committed to maintaining a place where readers and commenters can feel safe from adolescent BS. So here's the deal:

There are two kinds of anonymous comments: those by people who have a genuine fear of revenge from the dark side, and those from darksiders just hiding to avoid accountability. You may post comments anonymously, but I reserve the right to treat anonymous comments as found items that belong to me and do with them as I see fit.

If, on the other hand, you're willing to stand by your convictions and post under your own name or a regular handle, your comments belong to you, and I'll edit them only on egregious violations of respect for others.

If this doesn't work for you, I'm sure you'll be happier somewhere else.