Muggs archive

Tuesday, May 8, 2007

Assessing the assessor

Joanna Dodder adds some details and a correction to her previous good investigative work on the connections between Elise Townsend and Victor Hambrick. The unnamed Courier editor weighs in with the conclusion that Mr Hambrick is dirty enough to vote out if he doesn't resign. That might seem a bit intemperate to readers who favor innocence until guilt is proven. It also might seem a bit self-serving in that the editor favored Mr Hambrick's opponent in the election.

Guys, you have an opportunity to build some credibility here. Let Joanna do her job and don't screw it up with self-important tantrums.

Update, noonish: A thought: If the smell test is a proper criterion, why are the editors not calling for the resignation of Richie Rich Renzi?

6 comments:

  1. Man this Townsend thing has layers upon Layers dont it ? and uh this guy Hambrick was doing business for the last couple of years with Townsend and appears to (at the very least) played Played fast and loose with some political ethics rules .
    its too soon to tell if hes been a bad boy but it dont look good

    ReplyDelete
  2. If the smell test is a proper criterion, why are the editors not calling for the resignation of Richie Rich Renzi?


    cos they're schmucks?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Think about this: The media reports out of Washington on Renzi are mostly anonymous sources, but the Courier clearly has done its own investigation and digging in the Hambrick ordeal. There are similarities, but the local one is a lot clearer than the Renzi case.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Let's not stoop to name-calling, please.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Welcome Media Dude.

    I admit I wouldn't want to have Joanna after me, but I gotta think that a grand-jury investigation by a US Attorney rates a bit more official gravitas than a local reporter.

    ReplyDelete

I encourage you to share your own views and experience with me and other readers. How you do that matters, and I'm committed to maintaining a place where readers and commenters can feel safe from adolescent BS. So here's the deal:

There are two kinds of anonymous comments: those by people who have a genuine fear of revenge from the dark side, and those from darksiders just hiding to avoid accountability. You may post comments anonymously, but I reserve the right to treat anonymous comments as found items that belong to me and do with them as I see fit.

If, on the other hand, you're willing to stand by your convictions and post under your own name or a regular handle, your comments belong to you, and I'll edit them only on egregious violations of respect for others.

If this doesn't work for you, I'm sure you'll be happier somewhere else.