No kidding.
Cindy Barks' story has a lot of good, clear info. But what's going on at the end? Of the 15 pitiful souls who managed to show up for this meeting, only one appears -- the guy who thinks that this should all be handled by private companies. I smell something missing here.
For readers of the Daily Courier in Prescott, Arizona. Comment and discuss. Be nice, now.
Muggs archive
▼
Friday, April 27, 2007
3 comments:
I encourage you to share your own views and experience with me and other readers. How you do that matters, and I'm committed to maintaining a place where readers and commenters can feel safe from adolescent BS. So here's the deal:
There are two kinds of anonymous comments: those by people who have a genuine fear of revenge from the dark side, and those from darksiders just hiding to avoid accountability. You may post comments anonymously, but I reserve the right to treat anonymous comments as found items that belong to me and do with them as I see fit.
If, on the other hand, you're willing to stand by your convictions and post under your own name or a regular handle, your comments belong to you, and I'll edit them only on egregious violations of respect for others.
If this doesn't work for you, I'm sure you'll be happier somewhere else.
Steve: are you suggesting that only private enterprise gets a break by the Courier because of political slant? If that were so, how come they never mention the little bus line that already exists? Could it be not politics, but plain, ugly old business, i.e., namely that the PTA doesn't advertise???
ReplyDeleteThat's an interesting angle, J, but I can't do more than speculate one way or the other on why we get the coverage we do.
ReplyDeleteAnother thought: What is likely to happen to the PTA service if the City follows the recommendations and institutes a reasonably extensive public service?
What struck me is that only the Guy who was for privately owned Public transit was quoted. What were the other comments for Publicly funded mass trasnsit? Their Inclusion would have diminished the appearance of any slantand we wouldnt be havin this discussion.
ReplyDelete