For readers of the Daily Courier in Prescott, Arizona. Comment and discuss. Be nice, now.
Muggs archive
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Embattled Obama declares in speech, 'I don't quit'
2 comments:
I encourage you to share your own views and experience with me and other readers. How you do that matters, and I'm committed to maintaining a place where readers and commenters can feel safe from adolescent BS. So here's the deal:
There are two kinds of anonymous comments: those by people who have a genuine fear of revenge from the dark side, and those from darksiders just hiding to avoid accountability. You may post comments anonymously, but I reserve the right to treat anonymous comments as found items that belong to me and do with them as I see fit.
If, on the other hand, you're willing to stand by your convictions and post under your own name or a regular handle, your comments belong to you, and I'll edit them only on egregious violations of respect for others.
If this doesn't work for you, I'm sure you'll be happier somewhere else.
Every President in my lifetime has been embattled (whether the Courier used the term or not) and I think that's a good thing. The President and his team should be taken to task for the country's problems. It's the nature of politics. Jump into the fire, expect to be burned. Whether the paper used the term, every President going back to Johnson was embattled. Kennedy? I'm not sure whether Kennedy was embattled. The 60s was the decade that changed Americans' attitudes from "revere authority" to "question authority."
ReplyDeleteGail, my point isn't about what's happening with the President, rather that the Courier used the term for Obama and never for Bush, who by any measure was far more "embattled." The inference is that the editors used the adjective selectively to reduce Obama's image. Propaganda, in other words.
ReplyDelete