Muggs archive

Saturday, July 14, 2007

Talk of the Town: "1960s water report on aquifer was accurate"

Ha! I'll bet Ed McGavock thought Win Hjalmarson was dead too, so there'd be no one to rebut him. Speaking fluent bureaucratese, Hjalmarson dismantles the critics of his work with cold precision.

Shorter-term residents may not have heard about the Holiday Lakes swindle. It serves as a simple, direct example of what happens to the Verde when you open the taps on the Big Chino too wide, and Hjalmerson was there measuring the effect.

5 comments:

  1. How gratifying! I've been watching the political climate surrounding the water scene in Yavapai County for some time now. The blatant attempts by politicians and developers to downplay the looming water crisis that they are creating is disgusting. Watching a real scientist prevail once in a while is refreshing!

    ReplyDelete
  2. But what good does it do to have all those words on paper? Holes in the ground, pumps and pipes-- that's what is real.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The papers inform the citizens, and the citizens have a better grasp on the problem and how to address it. At least in theory.

    We have a huge problem with misinformation and disinformation around complex issues. If we can't agree on who's an authority, or worse, most people think that there can be no authority because all facts are opinions, decision-making is crippled.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In my humble opinion a reputable scientist, such as Ed McGavock considers himself, would have contacted Win Hjalmarson to check his facts about Win before he committed them to posterity. I was at the presentation that Ed McGavock made at the Upper Verde River Protection Coalition meeting and he made the comment "I am always right." He lost all credibility with me at that point, as there is only ONE that is always right and it is not Ed McGavock.
    It is time to move to the higher ground and move away from politically motivated decisions on water. That requires a wisdom we have not seen from our current city officials, an ability to look at what is best for the next generation and not what is best for the next election.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Welcome, Jack, and good luck with your campaign.

    ReplyDelete

I encourage you to share your own views and experience with me and other readers. How you do that matters, and I'm committed to maintaining a place where readers and commenters can feel safe from adolescent BS. So here's the deal:

There are two kinds of anonymous comments: those by people who have a genuine fear of revenge from the dark side, and those from darksiders just hiding to avoid accountability. You may post comments anonymously, but I reserve the right to treat anonymous comments as found items that belong to me and do with them as I see fit.

If, on the other hand, you're willing to stand by your convictions and post under your own name or a regular handle, your comments belong to you, and I'll edit them only on egregious violations of respect for others.

If this doesn't work for you, I'm sure you'll be happier somewhere else.