Muggs archive

Friday, April 20, 2007

A1: "Transit choice now in hands of local governments"

Props to the editors for giving Cindy Barks' story some prominence. We learn that the public "overwhelmingly" supports an extensive fixed-route bus system connecting our communities and workplaces. In the past the Courier has officially poo-poohed mass transit, but that resistance seems to be softening of late. Let's hope our elected officials can see the writing on the wall as well.

4 comments:

  1. The sin of ommission, recall? In almost all of the stories on the need for mass transit, I've almost never seen mention of the little bus that makes a round trip of Prescott once per hour. Most people are not aware of its existence. I suspect that it's a placeholder for the Prescott Transit Authority, hoping to get the contract for a bigger system,if and when -- but no mention? I don't drive, so I have taken a ride on the bus. It's sorta fun.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think they see the PTA bus as a private business, which it is. The mass transit would be a government enterprise. Big difference!

    ReplyDelete
  3. some questions
    why does the interfaith council want mass transit? I mean Im for it ..would rather have rail actually would reeeeeeallly rather have rail..but what's in it for the interfaith council?
    if the majority of folks riding the bus are with out car..how does this get cars off the road?
    why are they still talking about the taxi voucher system ..if it worked for everybody Im pretty sure we wouldnt be talkin about instituting the bus system

    ReplyDelete
  4. In my day job, I work with developmentally disabled and elderly folks. The lack of "an extensive fixed bus route" is felt very keenly in this population. The taxi voucher system is actually kind of hard to make happen for an individual.

    Interestingly, several churches actually movemore bodies around town in the course of a day from what I've heard, than the little bus.

    Perhaps that's why the Interfaith folks are interested?

    ReplyDelete

I encourage you to share your own views and experience with me and other readers. How you do that matters, and I'm committed to maintaining a place where readers and commenters can feel safe from adolescent BS. So here's the deal:

There are two kinds of anonymous comments: those by people who have a genuine fear of revenge from the dark side, and those from darksiders just hiding to avoid accountability. You may post comments anonymously, but I reserve the right to treat anonymous comments as found items that belong to me and do with them as I see fit.

If, on the other hand, you're willing to stand by your convictions and post under your own name or a regular handle, your comments belong to you, and I'll edit them only on egregious violations of respect for others.

If this doesn't work for you, I'm sure you'll be happier somewhere else.